From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Mon Mar 15 14:10:07 1999
Path: newscene.newscene.com!novia!news-stl.cp.verio.net!sea-feed.news.verio.net!feed.news.verio.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!206.165.3.11!nntp.primenet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Date: 15 Mar 1999 21:10:07 -0000
Subject: FZ BIBLE 5/35 SOLUTION TO ENTRAPMENT 9TH ACC
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
	<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
Message-ID: <ab6ae2b32ff8716cc3cb11ffaf79c25c@anonymous.poster>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 826
Xref: newscene.newscene.com alt.religion.scientology:689608 alt.clearing.technology:76072

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

9th ACC - THE SOLUTION TO ENTRAPMENT CASSETTES 5/35

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet
are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any
Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


9TH ACC CONTENTS

December 1954 to January 1955 in Phoenix, Arizona.

Based on the solution to entrappment cassette version.

F# = File number (** = not available)
O# = Original Number (according to the master list posted by Pilot)
REN = As renumbered in the Solution to Entrappment cassettes

F# O#  REN  DATE  TITLE

01  1   1  Dec  6 Introduction to 9th ACC: Havingness
02  2   2  Dec  7 The Essence of Auditing, Know to Mystery Scale
03  3   3  Dec  8 Rundown on Six Basics
04  4   4  Dec  9 Communication Formula
05  5   5  Dec 10 The Practice of Dianetics and Scientology
06  6   6  Dec 13 Conduct of the Auditor
07  7   7  Dec 14 Mechanics of Communication
08  8   8  Dec 15 Havingness
09  9   9  Dec 16 Pan-determinism and One-way Flows
10  9A 10  Dec 17 Hist. & Dev. of Processes: Games & Limitations in Games
11  9B 10A Dec 17 History and Development of Processes: Q&A Period
12 10  11  Dec 20 Games (Fighting)
13 11  12  Dec 21 Anatomy of Games -- Part I
14 11A 12A Dec 21 Anatomy of Games -- Part II
15 12  13  Dec 22 One-way Flows in Processing
16 12A 13A Dec 22 One-way Flows in Processing: Question and Answer Period
17 13  14  Dec 23 Havingness and Communication Formulas
** 13A --  Dec 23 After Lecture Comments   
18 14  15  Dec 24 Pan-determinism
19 14A 15A Dec 24 Pan-determinism: Question and Answer Period
20 15  16  Dec 27 Training New People
** 15A --  Dec 27 Curiosa from Dianetics 55!
21 16  17  Jan  3 Auditing Requirements, Differences
22 16A 18  Jan  4 Time
** 16AA -  Jan  4 Q&A Period
23 17  19  Jan  5 Auditing at Optimum
24 18  20  Jan  6 Exteriorization
25 19  21  Jan  7 Elementary Material: Know to Mystery Scale
26 20  22  Jan 10 Education: Goals in Society -- Adult Education
27 21  23  Jan 11 Fundamentals of Auditing
** 21A --  Jan 11 Auditors' Conference
28 22  24  Jan 12 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part I
29 23  25  Jan 13 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part II
30 24  26  Jan 14 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part III
31 25  27  Jan 17 Auditing Demonstration: Six Basics in Action
** 25A --  Jan 17 Auditors' Conference
32 26  28  Jan 18 Auditing Demonstration: Spotting Spots
** 26A --  Jan 18 Auditors' Conference
33 27  29  Jan 19 Auditing Demonstration: Exteriorization
34 28  30  Jan 20 Background Music to Living
35 29  31  Jan 21 Axioms: Laws of Consideration -- What an Axiom Is

Note that 6 of the 9 discussion periods (Q&A periods, Auditors'
Conferences, etc.) were omitted from the cassettes, leaving us
with only 35 files instead of the 41 that were recorded.  It is
also possible that material was edited out of the lectures which
are available.  If anyone has a set of the original reels, please
post any missing material.

========================

9ACC file 5/35

9th ACC 5 - THE PRACTICE OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY

Transcript of Lecture by L. Ron Hubbard 9ACC05    -    
5412C10 5th of 35 talks to sudents on the 9th Advanced
Clinical Course in Phoenix, Arizona given between December
6 1954 and January 21 1955

THE PRACTICE OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY

A lecture given on 10 December 1954


We're progressing here into a new era and strata of
Dianetics and Scientology. We have a period coming up
wherein we're trying to stress ability. Now, this is one of
the interesting things about Dianetics and
Scientology - they're so illegal. They're so illegal. It's
really fabulous. You'd think, for God sakes, that we were
working in there cheek by jowl with the US government and
the AMA and the psychology departments of Rotgut
University. You'd just think that this was the case. Now,
this is not the case.                

We're private individuals in a private association engaged
in research and investigation and the application of the
results to the betterment of humanity. But everybody's got
to get his foot in the act. The Better Business Bureau - I
don't know how much the Better Business Bureaus are bribed
(huh! another word for contribution) by the AMA. The Better
Business Bureau has the utter gall to come out time and
time again with statements that certain diseases are
utterly uncurable. And they tell the public consistently
that they should beware of anybody who raises their hope on
any of these things. What a filthy control operation. In
the first place, several of the diseases mentioned may not
be curable by the American Medical Association but have for
many years been successfully attacked by many other fields
of healing.

Let's take poliomyelitis. Sister Kenny actually performed
miracles with poliomyelitis, and yet the American Medical
Association says that after a few years of its getting set
and sodden and sought, poliomyelitis can have nothing
whatsoever done for it. And that is a lie. So we look at
the field of healing and we find out that a bunch of goofs,
who have let it be popularly known that you have to go to
school for twelve years before you learn how to scratch a
patient's nose, have all this nailed down. The hell they
have. They haven't got anything nailed down. Not a damn thing.

They might have their office scales nailed down, but that's
about all. Because they are not serving the American public
or the public of the world to the degree that that public
desires to be served. And that's the best reason they
haven't got things nailed down. Nobody from pole to pole on
this sphere has any slightest part of mental aberration or
correction nailed down. Nobody. We haven't got it nailed
down because we don't want to nail it down as a big monopoly.

But here is propaganda pouring out continually that nothing
can be done about these things. And we are actually working
upstream against the god-damnedest defeatist attitude you
ever saw - not on the part of the public, but on the part
of the people who are supposed to be in charge of this kind
of thing. What have we got to do?

Medical doctor says, "Apathy." Psychiatrist - he hasn't got
any business to go on living at all. He's a murderer. I've
just been looking around for a good hot case of a
psychiatrist to prosecute for murder.

There is nothing in the Constitution or the laws of any
state that says it's less a murder to kill an insane man
than a sane one. You will not find that in any statute.

You won't find in any statute barring homicide - no statute
whatsoever - will you discover that it says "homicide of sane
individuals." Homicide means the killing of a man, not a
sane man. And just because a guy flips his lid or his wife
runs off with the chauffeur and he spins a little bit is no
reason why a psychiatrist is then fully authorized to throw
him on an electric shock machine and kill him. I do mean
that; I mean kill him.

As far as prefrontal lobotomies are concerned, the
psychiatrist is very successful with the prefrontal
lobotomy. It always makes the patient quieter, he says,
when it doesn't kill him. It very often necessitates the
constant attendance of an attendant at sixty, a hundred
dollars a week from there on. They lose all physical
control. They lose control of the function of the bladder
and the bowels and so forth. This is uniform in the
prefrontal lobotomy, uniform rate.

What the hell are we looking at? Just what the hell are we
looking at?

Now, how could these dogs have anything to say about what
we did or how we could help people. It's like the criminals
out of some boozing den someplace rushing out and telling
decent citizens which way to go and how to drive, and so
forth. It's just nonsense.

When we look at aberration in this society we, of course,
are looking at the insaner side of the society. And of
course, it's irrational. And of course, one of the insane
activities is to stop all motion. You know, "We must stop
all motion," or "All motion is uncontrollable." That's
where we get into that bracket.

So when we start wading along the line going a little bit
upstream to research and investigation, we discover some
very interesting things. We discover that the public at
large is not antipathetic toward the betterment of
humanity. We discover that private individuals believe
something can be done for people. We believe that somebody,
when he gets somebody sick on his hands - you know, a
husband, he gets his wife sick on his hands - he'll go around
and look for help. And the doctor says, "There's nothing
can be done for it," apathy-apathy. And the psychiatrist
says, "There's nothing can be done except we got electric
shock, he-he-hu."

And the husband goes around still looking. And the Better
Business Bureau puts out pamphlets to tell him to stop
looking. How do you know? This is-this is fantastic.

The Better Business Bureau could be arrested today, or
sued, for the diagnosis of medical ills. It unqualifiedly
states in its pamphlets that such and so is incurable, and
nothing can be done for such and so, and the public must be
aware of anybody who says he can do anything for so and so.
And because these are uncurable, these are all incurable,
all incurable - that is medical diagnosis.

Of course, it'd be a great shock to any prosecuting
attorney in your district attorney's office to have you
suddenly walk in and issue a warrant for the president of
all the Better Business Bureaus for medical diagnosis.
Nevertheless, you could make it stick. It's no more insane
than what they're doing. As a matter of fact, it's a shade
saner.

So a great many problems arise for the individual
practitioner and for the organization, this organization,
any group that you get together, any church group you get
together - a great many problems are posed. Posed not by the
public, posed not by your general attitude, posed not by
any difficulty you might be having with technology,
techniques or unknowns in the preclear, the preclear's
environment.

These problems are surmountable. The problems you're posed
by is the fact that the government and the AMA, Better
Business Bureau and so forth all supposed they have a
vested interest in the health of the public. They suppose
they have one.

Actually, they have a vested in the unhealth of the public.
But we discover as we go forward that we get into,
occasionally, trouble with these. Even though we don't get
into a direct clash, they disturb us from our forward
course of existence by making us take measures and courses
which we would not ordinarily take, and this is the crux of
the situation. We have to make provisions and we have to
change the wording of; and we have to make sure that we
don't, and so forth. Why should we? We're a private
organization. We're private individuals. We are extremely
sincere in what we are trying to do.

And when I looked this over, I saw that we were facing a
roadblock of some kind or another. There's a roadblock. It
keeps an organization from making any great forward
progress. This is the roadblock I'm talking about. The
roadblock is not in the public mind. The public loves
problems. They'll dash off in all directions.

Somebody sets up a snakeroot oil stand, why, they rally
around and buy the snakeroot oil. To hell with it;
sometimes snakeroot oil works.

They have a - they have a completely free communication sort
of an attitude on it when you really start circulating
around. But they are influenced very definitely by
continuous contact with aberration. The fields of healing
are aberrated fields, highly aberrated. And the public gets
in contact with them and before they come to see an
auditor, they're liable to ask their doctor, and their
doctor says, "No! Guy-yap-yap-yap." "And here's a pamphlet
on the part of the Better Business Bureau that says
absolutely that you are incurable. Schizophrenia - nothing
can be done for a paranoid schiz. And that's what you are."

I mean I - this is a direct case history. A guy was all
bogged down. He came around to me and he says,
"Re-re-really isn't really any reason-reason for me to have
any auditing because I'm a paranoid schiz."

"You're what? What's a paranoid schiz?"

"Well, it's a - ." That dead ended him.

And then, "Nothing can be done for you because you're a
paranoid schiz. Is that right? And you don't even know what
a paranoid schiz is. Why don't you go and find out what a
paranoid schiz is?"

So he assigned himself this project and he went off trying
to find out what a paranoid schiz was. And after he had run
forty or fifty definitions through his mind on this
subject, he found out he could take his choice.

After I'd audited him for a little while, it was quite
amusing; he finally determined that we had better make up a
definition for a paranoid schiz because this was what he
was. And we found out it was a person who didn't like cream
in his coffee. And he finally settled on this.

So to some slight degree, we must be out of category,
right? If we find ourselves faced with a roadblock, then it
must be that we're out of category. Thee and me haven't
very much truck with the psychoanalytic front or the world
of medicine, something like that. We don't have much truck
with this. It doesn't immediately alert us as being the
most fascinating thing that we could deal with.

We're just going through some more definitions and
classifications, aren't we, when we say, well, we're
closely associated with medicine or psychology or
something like that. It's just cream in the coffee. They
might as well just say, "What we do is so-and-so and
so-and-so," and let it go at that.

Well, I found something quite interesting. And this is one
of the things that was holding me up on the book Dianetics
1955! I had to find out where we categorized Dianetics and
Scientology. What's the category. Obviously, the public has
to have a category. Discovered something quite interesting.

We're - we're dealing, in processing, with self-cognition,
aren't we, continually - recognition of self recognition of
life, cognition. Fellow finds out new things about himself.
He finds out that he can do this, that he doesn't have to
be afraid of that. He discovers these things, doesn't he?
And all of our auditing is actually slanted in the
direction of self-discovery. This is sort of a covert
method of sitting the guy down and instead of yapping data
at him on the subject - "Now, you realize that it is because
you kissed your little sister when you were two is why
you're aberrated." I mean, we don't do that, see.

What we do is we run him on the basics of existence, and we
don't care what he had to discover. He'll tell us sooner or
later in a great shocked state that by golly, that didn't
matter whether he kissed his sister or not, did it? And,
self-cognition.

Well, self-cognition is a brand-new thing, isn't it, in
a - in the field of healing. Doesn't belong in the field of
healing. The field of healing, nobody ever deals with that.
Actually, what they do is they come around and they pass a
magic wand and say boof-woof or take three times a day,
t.i.d., or some other magic incantation.

[t.i.d = Latin: "ter in die" meaning take 3 times a day,
used in medical perscriptions - Ed.]

And it's all exterior to the field of healing, isn't it?
They even speak of some healing that was done a couple of
thousand years ago as totally exterior, see. Healing was
done by Joe on Bill. That right? I mean, medicine and
healing and psychiatry and psychoanalysis, and so forth,
deal then with this weird angle.

Some clinical psychology has to do with self-cognition, but
not to any great degree. What they do is they want the
fellow to recognize what is wrong with him, you see. And we
don't want anybody to recognize what's wrong with him. We
want to recognize what's right with him.

All right. So we're looking around for a category, and we
find out that you know that we're a cut above education and
that education intervenes between us and healing. Well,
for heaven's sakes. Get the idea.

I mean, not only are we not immediately associated with
what man calls healing - doesn't matter whether we can heal
or not, it's what man calls healing, what he applies this
label to - not only are we not associated intimately with
that, but we're not even really intimately associated with
education. We try to hold education to a minimum even in
training auditors.

We want him to recognize that what he is doing is the right
thing, and that if he goes on doing it, this and that will
occur as a result thereof, and we don't really try to
batter him into line if he is just in complete revolt and
says, "8-C won't do anything for anybody, 8-C won't do
anything for anybody." We say, "Well, try it out."

Nobody, for instance, in a university, teaching a class in
physics, is going to trifle with some student that says,
"The vector formulas don't work, you know. The vector
formulas don't work." What do they do? They flunk you. They
don't tell him to go out and spin a top or fix up a sling
and - and swing it around his head. They don't do this. They
flunk him, that's all.

Looks like we're associating here with a universe and an
attitude which is distinctly different than the one we're
working with, see? So actually, education - getting people to
know by the process of lecture and examination - is lower on
the scale than what we are doing, and lower on the scale
than that is the fields of healing as recognized. So we're
actually above the level of education, and it'd be much
more proper for us to constitute ourselves a field of
education by self-cognition. This would be a brand-new
system of education. So people get well. Well, you say that
dives back into the field of healing. Oh, no, it doesn't.
People get able.

You know, all they're trying to do - I put my - put the axe in
on trying in engineering school. All they're trying to do
in an engineering school is trying to make somebody capable
as an engineer, aren't they; that's what they're trying to
do. It's going to take hard experience in all kinds of
things to complete this proposition. And he never is going
to be cognizant with - he never is going to be cognizant with
the entire field of mechanics and so forth, mostly because
they let him flunk elementary physics.                        

So all of our difficulty so far has been in the fact that
we have mislabeled ourselves. Completely mislabeled
ourselves. We're educators in a very, very much finer sense
than most teachers. You get the idea? We are educating a
preclear by a process of self-cognition. We're educating
him about himself and about life, not by pouring data at
him, but by working processes upon him.

Therefore, we're imminently concerned with abilities, and
we are extremely helpful where he is concerned on his
problems. Why? Do you think there is any difference between
a person having a problem as an individual and an engineer
having a problem as a professional engineer? Is there any
difference in this?

Education levels at the solution of problems. We are
leveled at the solution of problems, and even the remedy
of the scarcity of problems.

So we have a process here of education, don't we?
Self-education. And if we called ourselves self-education
(what is Dianetics? Dianetics is a self-education. It's an
education about yourself), why, we would be several cuts
up, wouldn't we?

Do you know that it's illegal to insure anybody to the
effect that you'll return his money if you cure his arthritis?

In other words, the law enforces dishonesty upon the
practitioner in an effort to uphold the practice on the
part of doctors of receiving, accepting and keeping fees
even when they do nothing for the patient. The honest thing
to do, is when you have not accomplished your action, would
be to refund the money. This would be the most honest thing
you could do. Is that right? The law makes it impossible
for you to do so. That, of course, is to protect this other
practice.

If you had a bunch of practitioners around driving
Cadillacs with the average income of $12,500 a year who
depended exclusively upon being able to keep the money even
when they failed to deliver the goods, and you suddenly
told them that they had to return the money when they
didn't deliver the goods, do you know what would happen to
that whole profession? It would simply collapse because
they cannot heal. The public - they would have to face this
fact themselves, you see. Seventy percent of the ills
which are brought to them are psychosomatic, and they give
them some histamine or some antibug juice or something like
that. Somebody comes to them with arthritis, they say go to
Arizona. Or they give them some gold shots or something
like this. Somebody has a heart trouble and they gives them
some ACTH, but of course this heart trouble comes right
back instantly that the ACTH is laid off In other words,
it's something that holds things in abeyance like drugs.

Now, they can put a person out of pain by simply giving
them enough morphine. Well, any witch doctor has been able
to do that since the beginning of time. Indian hemp three
thousand years ago would put a man out of pain. You give
anybody enough cyanide, and he really goes right on out of
pain.

So this is an easy one. This is an easy one. It's not fcr
nothing that the doctor complains against the laws
forbidding euthanasia, mercy killing. It would be his
fastest cure. He gets upset because he's not permitted to
do mercy killing.

I'm not trying to vilify the doctor; I'm merely saying he's
ignorant. I'm not trying to run down his skill; I'm just
saying he doesn't have any. I'm sure he has a nice bedside
manner. I'm sure he's sweet to his nurses. And I'm sure his
hospitals are well run like any company or regiment is
well run. I'm sure of this.

Outside of the fact that one of our boys, the Church of
Scientology group, the other day walked into a private room
found a woman hemorrhaging to death, no attendant anywhere
near her. He got an attendant and stopped the hemorrhage,
and so on. He did a little work for the medical profession.

But look here. If these things are problems, if all these
ills are simply problems, and if people are basically
having an awfully hard time trying to solve all these
problems, and if they merely have problems in order to get
answers - . Look at that one for a minute. That's one way of
getting an answer, isn't it? You get a problem then you
solve it, then you've got an answer. That's very covert.

And if this is the case, then we find out that these
organizations and professions which I have been vilifying
here - that these boys are pandering to a sort of a circuit,
aren't they? And so you'd really never expect them to come
up very far or actually get into action in the society
because they're validating circuits all the time, circuits
that bring up problems. They pay attention to this. They
solve by means of drugs, surgery, and so forth, the things
that have been kicked into being by entities.

Well, that would make the whole thing kind of potty,
wouldn't it? I mean, everybody would - this would look real
goofy.

Supposing you as an auditor pledged yourself never to pay
any attention to the preclear but to only pay attentions to
the circuits which are criticizing him inside his head, the
circuits which were invalidating him every time he said,
"You know, I'm a pretty good fellow" and something said to
him, "Oh, no you're not." And if you never paid any
attention to "I'm a pretty good fellow," the fellow says,
but only to these other things that were invalidating him
and so forth, you would find your career as an auditor
perhaps interesting but not very successful. The results
on cases would be very poor. The exteriorization of an
entity or a machine from the body is a very difficult thing
to accomplish.

But the popping of the preclear out of his head is not too
difficult, not with the techniques we have there in
Dianetics 1955!

All right. Then if we'd been off on the wrong strike, it
was probably because of a misunderstanding of what was
going on, you see. If we classified ourselves with the field
of medicine, with the field of psychiatry and that sort of
thing, we would be classifying ourselves with groups which
paid total attention to circuits and misconditions, and so
forth. What, for instance, is a guilt complex but a
circuit? Well, that is the total goal of psychoanalysis:
eradication of a guilt complex.

Well, we'd certainly limit ourselves, wouldn't we? We ever
really get in touch with any of the truth in the society if
we went on validating circuits? Well, if we just classi~
ourselves with the field of healing forcefully enough and
strongly enough, we would fail, because the field of
healing is failing. And it's failing very finely. The
public is getting more and more and more excited about
doctor bills and about other malfunctions. The public right
now believes that anything would be better than psychiatry.
I call your attention to a poll conducted by Collier's
magazine in 1951, I think it was, inspired by myself in 1950.

All right. When we get a condition where we would be in
continuous, intimate contact with a bunch of circuits such
as the AMA, the American Psychiatric and so forth, we would
wind up in the soup, wouldn't we? Now, you see where we've
been going all this time? We'd wind up in the soup.

In other words, here on the third dynamic we would
associate ourselves only with circuits, classify ourselves
with circuits, and believe that these circuits
were blocking us in our progress toward a goal.

Well, that's what we believed up to date.

See that? We believe that we were being blocked by a bunch
of circuits. Well, naturally, you think the - healing a
preclear, you're being blocked by a bunch of circuits.
Well, really, you're not now - with the processes in
Dianetics 1955! and what we know right here - we're not
really being blocked by circuits at all. We simply increase
the person's power of decision and location, and finally
he's three feet back of his head. And this is all we do.
It's the most simplest thing you ever heard of - idiotically
simple. Should have thought of it a long time ago.

All right. So somebody says he's got ulcers. Well, we say
'We don't care whether somebody said he had ulcers or not.
And we don't say he has ulcers. We don't care anything
about his ulcers. We simply want to rehabilitate his
ability to eat corn and drink whiskey. We don't care
anything about his arthritis. Somebody says he has
arthritis. So what? We don't care." We could say they
had - he had plombosis and arthrosis and all kinds of other
Latin diseases. It seems like most of the medical diseases
are - were brought here straight from the Roman Empire,
but - and that they were simply symbols.

Now, we won't care if he's been shot, had a broken arm, had
arthritis, had poliomyelitis - or whatever else anybody said
with bum Latin - we're going to ensure him that he will be
able, through the processes of self-education, to put his
hands over his head. There's nothing illegal about that,
and we are validating an actuality. A man should be able to
put his hands over his head, shouldn't he? Nobody can argue
with this. They might try. But they go into apathy right away.

Because they're a circuit, and they're looking at truth. We
say this man truthfully should be able to put his hands
over his head. He should be able to walk across the room.
He should be able to take a drink of whiskey without
obsessively and compulsively going on drinking whiskey.

In other words, we simply ensure him that - or assure him,
you might say, that he will be able to drink whiskey.
Obviously, now, the medical profession says he can't drink
whiskey because the enzymes are on the rootle pods, and it
so happens that the excitation of the lower thrombosis is
continually in juxtaposition, and that's why he can't drink
whiskey. Well, we don't care anything about this. We don't
happen to agree with all this juxtaposition of the
thrombosis. Actually, do you know that alcoholism is now
diagnosed by the American Medical Association as an enzyme
characteristic which is unrecoverable because it is
dielectric? That's right. It isn't that the fact that the
guy takes a drink of whiskey and then can't stop drinking
whiskey. See, that's not what alcoholism is. It's something
very covert and Latin.

All right. When we discover this - preclear cannot drink
whiskey - we simply by process of self-education, "We will
fix you up so you can drink whiskey." And that actually is
the legal court test of an alcoholic. They put the
alcoholic on the witness stand and they give him a glass of
whiskey, if he claims he's not an alcoholic. And they put
another couple of glasses nearby. An alcoholic will drink
the first one, the second one and the third
one pang-pang-pang and ask for more right away. He's got to
have more. You see, he's trying to get a full glass in
front of him.

He knew he was all right before he emptied that glass.
That's actually what he's doing, by the way. He's trying to
get a full glass of whiskey in front of him.

Now this individual has an obsessive characteristic whereby
he believes that somebody is going to murder him. You know,
he believes this all the time. He's up all night. So you
assure him he'll be able to sleep nights after some
auditing. This isn't even covert. This is completely overt.
This is the right thing. This is the direction in which
we're traveling - restoring an individual's ability.
What's education do? Simply restores an ability or creates
one. See that? So, much more properly, we are in the field
of education. By self-education, by self-recognition, an
individual can do a great many more things than he now is
able to do. And what do you know, the public agrees with
us. A very broad spread in its agreement. An individual can
be educated into doing this and that. He can be taught out
of his fear, you know?

You can educate somebody into feeling secure in his
environment. You can teach him that people aren't after
him. Nobody is going to argue with this.

They're going to say at - occasionally that this is a method
to get around the fact that you are actually healing this
person's paranoid schizophrenia or something of the sort.
And you can say, "Paranoid schizophrenia - what's that?" And
then you really have started a ball, because nobody will be
able to tell you or the judge or anybody else.

Now, where you have - where you have validated a preclear's
inabilities, you will find that these have become interesting.

Actually, the best thing that you can say about a circuit
is that it's being interesting. Boy! Is it being
interesting. All the freedom in the world is right back of
the preclear, but there he is facing that very interesting
circuit, and every time he starts to do something, he's
right there looking at that circuit. Do you see that?

It is the interestingness of the circuit which compels
attention to it. If we were to call auditors teachers, we
would have a more interesting reaction on the part of the
public. For instance, an auditor says - the public asks an
auditor, "Well, what are you exactly?" - they mean, "Give me
another name for yourself." And if the auditor said, "Well,
I'm a professor of self-education," people would be much
more edified than if the fellow said, "Well, I'm not quite
a psychoanalyst, but almost. And I'm very close to
psychology, but I'm not," and so on, it makes a
qualification a classification which is very difficult.
Well, if this qualification, classification is very
difficult, then there must be an error in it someplace,
mustn't there? And the error is just that: You're closer to
education than you are to psychiatric activity.

Now, the uses to which Dianetics and Scientology have been
put - where they have commanded some alertness on the part of
the government, for instance and so forth - have been right
in the fields of education. Some experiments were carried
out in Great Britain with gunnery classes and radar
classes, that sort of thing. And it was discovered that the
world of education has an awfully hard time of it.

A gunnery class was rejecting 80 percent of its applicants
after they'd been in class for quite a while. Imagine that.
Eighty percent of the applicants were incapable of doing
this line of action. Now, some terrific percentage of the
applicants who went halfway through radar school and so
forth had to be jettisoned.

Here you were educating this vast number of people in order
to get this little handful of competents. Well, this is a
heck of a note, isn't it. Application of Dianetics,
Scientology in those particular spheres - in one particular
instance, it was stated to me - successfully graduated all of
the applicants. Well, this is fantastic. I mean, what the
heck here? You mean, why, the training being done in the
frame of reference of Dianetics and Scientology with some
Group Processing and so forth, why, we discover - we discover
that all of the applicants could be graduated. And this was
a very good thing because this scarcity of graduates had
brought about a scarcity of this rate - this rating,
trained in the armed service. Get that?

I mean, they didn't have anywhere near enough of these
people, you see, and yet they were having to jettison most
of their graduates - pardon me, applicants and students
somewhere along the line. And here all of a sudden, why,
somebody up and graduated the whole class. Well, this was a
happy thing, actually, and this particular case did command
some attention from the admiralty. This was an interesting
factor.

By aiding and abetting, then, what education is trying to
do, you have a considerable field lying out in front of
you. Now, one of the main things that has been wrong so far
is that educators didn't immediately step up and solicit
the services of auditors. Well, that's because they - because
they're kind of apathetic. They're kind of apathetic.

Supposing you - . Horrible thought. I mean, we re... - this is 
a real wild one, but we just pitch this one just as a - as a
little problem here. Supposing you set up - I'm not asking
you to do this - a school to teach high school in a year.
You're going to successfully get the person through the New
York Regents Examinations in one year. You certainly would
be doing something that would command a little bit of
interest there, one way or the other. You'd certainly
command the interest of a bunch of the students going to
the local high school.

Supposing you starting a driving school saying people had
been turned down in their driver's licenses and who have
not been able to pass driving tests, so forth, should come
to school here in order to get their driving test. And
we'll guarantee that after you've been through school here,
you'll get your driver's license. I don't know. I think it
might command some interest. Very well might. There are
quite a few of these around, by the way.

Of course, the law gets in your road there. They put
arbitrary time limits because of the emotional instability
of a person. This person has accidents, and therefore he
can't have a driver's license. And you remove the emotional
instability and make it able - make him able to drive, you
see. You increase his ability in driving, and then the law
doesn't believe you, because they put an arbitrary
factor - this person can't have a driver's license, see. All
that, however, would have to be altered and changed.

Now, I bring up that one because a fellow recently did an
interesting experiment. His wife went down to get her
driver's license, and he - she flunked. And he took her and
ran 8-C on the car every day for a short time, and she went
back down and passed the test with flying colors and was
next seen driving through Piccadilly Circus, and everybody
knows nobody can drive through Piccadilly Circus. This is
in the forthcoming issue of the Journal, by the way. But
here is a - here is a level of application, very interesting
level of application. There's a much wider field looks at
one by a reason of this.

Now, I think we can actually practically consider ourselves
departing from and divorced from the fields of healing as
categorized by it.

It's certain that with all the technology which we possess
that we are developing a considerable explosive power in
the society. You cannot put this much knowingness in one
group, you cannot put this much ability in one group
without it exploding sooner or later. It's just an
impossibility. And we're just trying to guide the direction
it's liable to explode.

It has only been a couple of months that auditors have felt
very, very, very secure about being able to get results on
a preclear. They felt secure about it. They're getting
cocky, which is a very good state of mind. And auditors
are getting interested in auditing. A lot of auditors have
been around that had stopped being interested in auditing.
They're watching some of the results turn up, and they're
getting interested in auditing.

(end of lecture)





